VibeusLoadingЗагрузка
Vibeus

Loading is taking longer than usual.Загрузка занимает больше времени, чем обычно.

The full page couldn't load.Не удалось полностью загрузить страницу.

You can read the available content below or try loading the page again.Вы можете читать доступный контент ниже или повторить загрузку страницы.

QEngine 1.3.1 reached 504 tokens/s for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in... - Vibeus

Ren Akiyama ·

QEngine 1.3.1 reached 504 tokens/s for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in Relative-Ant-9249’s single-stream test: 2×32 GB RTX 5090, Threadripper PRO 3975WX, 251 GB RAM, 262K context, INT4 AutoRound. Credit for QEngine goes to bpx03.

Default narrative/code decode: 370/439 tokens/s; FLASH_KV=ram: 406/504. The chart compares Strata, bucko vLLM and Infernix. Repeated prompts favour QEngine’s adaptive expert cache; earlier varied traffic measured 300–400 tokens/s. The tester’s fair comparison is roughly 1.4–1.9× Strata and 3× bucko. Prefill beats Strata at 10K but trails it at 90K.

At turn 12 of a tool-use benchmark, QEngine read the prompt in 1.75 seconds, level with Strata’s 1.7–1.9.

A 13.5 GB pinned-RAM KV pool retained all eight idle ~58K-token conversations after 400K tokens of other traffic: 1.56–2.01-second returns. VRAM retained two; six needed 8.7–9.4-second prefills. Answers remained correct. RAM decode was ~10% faster alone but ~10% slower with eight concurrent 64K streams: 124 versus 139 tokens/s, one pass.

Assistant tasks: 44/44; delegation: 6/6. The earlier rc4 coding result, 26/30, sits within Strata’s 24–26 repeat range; it was not rerun on 1.3.1. Tight VRAM, source compilation for sm_120 and limited runtime history remain costs. These are single-user measurements.

Источник

Publication image